<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft Interoperability: Microsoft opens up its data formats and platforms</title>
	<atom:link href="http://robertogaloppini.net/2008/02/21/microsoft-interoperability-microsoft-opens-up-its-data-formats-and-platforms/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://robertogaloppini.net/2008/02/21/microsoft-interoperability-microsoft-opens-up-its-data-formats-and-platforms/</link>
	<description>“equally critical of proprietary and open source myths, advocating software choice beyond marketing and romanticism”</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Carlo Daffara</title>
		<link>http://robertogaloppini.net/2008/02/21/microsoft-interoperability-microsoft-opens-up-its-data-formats-and-platforms/comment-page-1/#comment-271813</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlo Daffara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 10:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robertogaloppini.net/2008/02/21/microsoft-interoperability-microsoft-opens-up-its-data-formats-and-platforms/#comment-271813</guid>
		<description>Many others have commented that this kind of announcements are being done with a certain regularity, and that the patent covenant are not extended to "commercial open source developers" (whatever that may means) but only for "noncommercial OSS developers". I have found much more interesting the announcement  that Microsoft will provide a list of patents that cover specific API and technology, and this will provide a "navigation" across potentially infringing open source implementations, or the possibility for invalidation (by the identification of prior art, for example) of patents that cannot be circumvented.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many others have commented that this kind of announcements are being done with a certain regularity, and that the patent covenant are not extended to &#8220;commercial open source developers&#8221; (whatever that may means) but only for &#8220;noncommercial OSS developers&#8221;. I have found much more interesting the announcement  that Microsoft will provide a list of patents that cover specific API and technology, and this will provide a &#8220;navigation&#8221; across potentially infringing open source implementations, or the possibility for invalidation (by the identification of prior art, for example) of patents that cannot be circumvented.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

