<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: About European Commission in-depth investigation into Oracle-Sun Merger</title>
	<atom:link href="http://robertogaloppini.net/2009/09/05/about-european-commission-in-depth-investigation-into-oracle-sun-merger/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://robertogaloppini.net/2009/09/05/about-european-commission-in-depth-investigation-into-oracle-sun-merger/</link>
	<description>“equally critical of proprietary and open source myths, advocating software choice beyond marketing and romanticism”</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Roberto Galoppini</title>
		<link>http://robertogaloppini.net/2009/09/05/about-european-commission-in-depth-investigation-into-oracle-sun-merger/comment-page-1/#comment-661572</link>
		<dc:creator>Roberto Galoppini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 07:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robertogaloppini.net/?p=1587#comment-661572</guid>
		<description>Hi Peter,

 I suspect that IT concentration has different roots. Europe missed to take advantage of the "packaged" software era in the early 90's, but few players (SAP). IT market worked and works by reselling US software plus selling system integration services.

 So said, I'm with you when you state that the commission anti-trust division seems to miss the real point, and as I wrote I'd like EU to put its (our) money where its money is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Peter,</p>
<p> I suspect that IT concentration has different roots. Europe missed to take advantage of the &#8220;packaged&#8221; software era in the early 90&#8217;s, but few players (SAP). IT market worked and works by reselling US software plus selling system integration services.</p>
<p> So said, I&#8217;m with you when you state that the commission anti-trust division seems to miss the real point, and as I wrote I&#8217;d like EU to put its (our) money where its money is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Parker</title>
		<link>http://robertogaloppini.net/2009/09/05/about-european-commission-in-depth-investigation-into-oracle-sun-merger/comment-page-1/#comment-661563</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 09:46:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robertogaloppini.net/?p=1587#comment-661563</guid>
		<description>Concentration in IT markets, especially in Europe, is basically induced by anticompetitive characteristics and legally questionable activities of three IT companies since long: IBM, Microsoft, HP.
Non-approval of upper merger will not lead to further competition. The opposite will be the case. Moreover the Open Source market,
actively promoted by Sun Microsystems, will suffer seriously.
Now this anticompetitiveness is actively supported by the EU commission's antitrust division, headed by Mrs. Kroes. This fact is casting serious doubts in the work and competency of Mrs. Kroes' team world-wide.
The commercial branch of MySQL has a market share of 0.4% officially and is thus far from being able to cause a concentration in the database market.
Having said this, I notify that EU commission's decisions itself will have to be regarded as cause of concentration in case of
disapproval of above merger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Concentration in IT markets, especially in Europe, is basically induced by anticompetitive characteristics and legally questionable activities of three IT companies since long: IBM, Microsoft, HP.<br />
Non-approval of upper merger will not lead to further competition. The opposite will be the case. Moreover the Open Source market,<br />
actively promoted by Sun Microsystems, will suffer seriously.<br />
Now this anticompetitiveness is actively supported by the EU commission&#8217;s antitrust division, headed by Mrs. Kroes. This fact is casting serious doubts in the work and competency of Mrs. Kroes&#8217; team world-wide.<br />
The commercial branch of MySQL has a market share of 0.4% officially and is thus far from being able to cause a concentration in the database market.<br />
Having said this, I notify that EU commission&#8217;s decisions itself will have to be regarded as cause of concentration in case of<br />
disapproval of above merger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roberto Galoppini</title>
		<link>http://robertogaloppini.net/2009/09/05/about-european-commission-in-depth-investigation-into-oracle-sun-merger/comment-page-1/#comment-661061</link>
		<dc:creator>Roberto Galoppini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 10:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robertogaloppini.net/?p=1587#comment-661061</guid>
		<description>Hi Josef,

 I was thinking of research calls, sorry. We can learn a lot from the past in this respect, see the &lt;a href="http://codespeak.net/pypy/extradoc/talk/2004-21C3-pypy-EU-hpk.pdf" rel="nofollow"&gt;PyPy Story&lt;/a&gt;!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Josef,</p>
<p> I was thinking of research calls, sorry. We can learn a lot from the past in this respect, see the <a href="http://codespeak.net/pypy/extradoc/talk/2004-21C3-pypy-EU-hpk.pdf" rel="nofollow">PyPy Story</a>!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 451 CAOS Links (caostheory) 's status on Monday, 07-Sep-09 08:52:11 UTC - Identi.ca</title>
		<link>http://robertogaloppini.net/2009/09/05/about-european-commission-in-depth-investigation-into-oracle-sun-merger/comment-page-1/#comment-661059</link>
		<dc:creator>451 CAOS Links (caostheory) 's status on Monday, 07-Sep-09 08:52:11 UTC - Identi.ca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 08:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robertogaloppini.net/?p=1587#comment-661059</guid>
		<description>[...]  http://robertogaloppini.net/2009/09/05/about-european-commission-in-depth-investigation-into-oracle...       a few seconds ago  from  Twhirl [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  <a href="http://robertogaloppini.net/2009/09/05/about-european-commission-in-depth-investigation-into-oracle.." rel="nofollow">http://robertogaloppini.net/2009/09/05/about-european-commission-in-depth-investigation-into-oracle..</a>.       a few seconds ago  from  Twhirl [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josef Assad</title>
		<link>http://robertogaloppini.net/2009/09/05/about-european-commission-in-depth-investigation-into-oracle-sun-merger/comment-page-1/#comment-661058</link>
		<dc:creator>Josef Assad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 06:14:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robertogaloppini.net/?p=1587#comment-661058</guid>
		<description>As I recall (happy to be corrected), naming specific products in EU tenders is in violation of tender law. To wit, a tender may reference a RDBMS as requirement but not SQL Server 2008. This is why for example the Hungarians &lt;a href="http://www.osor.eu/news/hu-hearing-on-competition-office-complaint-over-microsoft-deal" rel="nofollow"&gt;got into hot water&lt;/a&gt; over the Microsoft-heavy public tender a while back.

It's probably a bit unrealistic in this day and age to think that a tender can be specific enough without referencing specific technologies and products but that's the law today and if we're going to advise against naming Microsoft in tenders then MySQL shouldn't be targeted with this form of financing either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I recall (happy to be corrected), naming specific products in EU tenders is in violation of tender law. To wit, a tender may reference a RDBMS as requirement but not SQL Server 2008. This is why for example the Hungarians <a href="http://www.osor.eu/news/hu-hearing-on-competition-office-complaint-over-microsoft-deal" rel="nofollow">got into hot water</a> over the Microsoft-heavy public tender a while back.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s probably a bit unrealistic in this day and age to think that a tender can be specific enough without referencing specific technologies and products but that&#8217;s the law today and if we&#8217;re going to advise against naming Microsoft in tenders then MySQL shouldn&#8217;t be targeted with this form of financing either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

