<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Open Source CMS Awards 2009: My favorite Winner is&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://robertogaloppini.net/2009/11/18/open-source-cms-awards-2009-my-favorite-winner-is/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://robertogaloppini.net/2009/11/18/open-source-cms-awards-2009-my-favorite-winner-is/</link>
	<description>“equally critical of proprietary and open source myths, advocating software choice beyond marketing and romanticism”</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:23:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Roberto Galoppini</title>
		<link>http://robertogaloppini.net/2009/11/18/open-source-cms-awards-2009-my-favorite-winner-is/comment-page-1/#comment-662714</link>
		<dc:creator>Roberto Galoppini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 19:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robertogaloppini.net/?p=1729#comment-662714</guid>
		<description>Hi Chris,

 you are definitely right saying that is a matter of preference, and public directories maybe outdated and have to be taken with a pinch of salt.

 Beyond personal preferences a number of metrics can help customers go open source, though. Recently I have been analyzing 4 open source selection methodologies, studying findings from 8 different research projects and assessing over 60 tools useful to measure software quality and other indicators, eventually creating a system for fast open source software selection. I'll soon share some charts and reports comparing open source CMS and other open source applications walking through the system's highlights, stay tuned!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Chris,</p>
<p> you are definitely right saying that is a matter of preference, and public directories maybe outdated and have to be taken with a pinch of salt.</p>
<p> Beyond personal preferences a number of metrics can help customers go open source, though. Recently I have been analyzing 4 open source selection methodologies, studying findings from 8 different research projects and assessing over 60 tools useful to measure software quality and other indicators, eventually creating a system for fast open source software selection. I&#8217;ll soon share some charts and reports comparing open source CMS and other open source applications walking through the system&#8217;s highlights, stay tuned!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Daley</title>
		<link>http://robertogaloppini.net/2009/11/18/open-source-cms-awards-2009-my-favorite-winner-is/comment-page-1/#comment-662709</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Daley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 22:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robertogaloppini.net/?p=1729#comment-662709</guid>
		<description>As a project manager who loves WordPress, I often get asked why is it the right CMS to use.  At the end of the day it comes down to preference.  Preference of the client and developer.

However, at a meetup in San Diego recently on the discussion of what CMS to use, the leader of the discussion said the Open Source CMS matrix was a good place to get a comparison.  The reality is that it is not a good source of information.  The version of WP they are using for the comparison is 2.2.1 when the most recent is 2.9.1.  Anyone who has worked with WP knows the improvements made between these versions are astounding and the main reason why WP just won the Best Open Source CMS in 2009.

Great post on how to view a comparison.

/soapbox</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a project manager who loves WordPress, I often get asked why is it the right CMS to use.  At the end of the day it comes down to preference.  Preference of the client and developer.</p>
<p>However, at a meetup in San Diego recently on the discussion of what CMS to use, the leader of the discussion said the Open Source CMS matrix was a good place to get a comparison.  The reality is that it is not a good source of information.  The version of WP they are using for the comparison is 2.2.1 when the most recent is 2.9.1.  Anyone who has worked with WP knows the improvements made between these versions are astounding and the main reason why WP just won the Best Open Source CMS in 2009.</p>
<p>Great post on how to view a comparison.</p>
<p>/soapbox</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nova</title>
		<link>http://robertogaloppini.net/2009/11/18/open-source-cms-awards-2009-my-favorite-winner-is/comment-page-1/#comment-662280</link>
		<dc:creator>Nova</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 22:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robertogaloppini.net/?p=1729#comment-662280</guid>
		<description>As a long-time Joomla! user turned WP-convert, my feeling is that this is simply a recognition of what WP users have already known. I'm glad I finally made the switch. Congratulations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a long-time Joomla! user turned WP-convert, my feeling is that this is simply a recognition of what WP users have already known. I&#8217;m glad I finally made the switch. Congratulations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Links 21/11/2009: Smartbooks and Fedora 13 Plans Appear &#124; Boycott Novell</title>
		<link>http://robertogaloppini.net/2009/11/18/open-source-cms-awards-2009-my-favorite-winner-is/comment-page-1/#comment-661959</link>
		<dc:creator>Links 21/11/2009: Smartbooks and Fedora 13 Plans Appear &#124; Boycott Novell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robertogaloppini.net/?p=1729#comment-661959</guid>
		<description>[...] Open Source CMS Awards 2009: My favorite Winner is… All open source CMS deserve attention, if in doubt which one to use, have a look at Open Source CMS matrix or go through QSOS CMS evaluation score cards. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Open Source CMS Awards 2009: My favorite Winner is… All open source CMS deserve attention, if in doubt which one to use, have a look at Open Source CMS matrix or go through QSOS CMS evaluation score cards. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Open Source CMS Awards 2009: My favorite Winner is…&#160;&#124;&#160;Open Hacking</title>
		<link>http://robertogaloppini.net/2009/11/18/open-source-cms-awards-2009-my-favorite-winner-is/comment-page-1/#comment-661909</link>
		<dc:creator>Open Source CMS Awards 2009: My favorite Winner is…&#160;&#124;&#160;Open Hacking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 23:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robertogaloppini.net/?p=1729#comment-661909</guid>
		<description>[...] the rest here:  Open Source CMS Awards 2009: My favorite Winner is…    This entry was posted on Wednesday, November 18th, 2009 at 1:43 pm and is filed under News, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the rest here:  Open Source CMS Awards 2009: My favorite Winner is…    This entry was posted on Wednesday, November 18th, 2009 at 1:43 pm and is filed under News, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

