<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apache Incubator: Extraordinary Made Ordinary, the Subversion case</title>
	<atom:link href="http://robertogaloppini.net/2009/11/26/apache-incubator-extraordinary-made-ordinary-the-subversion-case/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://robertogaloppini.net/2009/11/26/apache-incubator-extraordinary-made-ordinary-the-subversion-case/</link>
	<description>“equally critical of proprietary and open source myths, advocating software choice beyond marketing and romanticism”</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:05:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Roberto Galoppini</title>
		<link>http://robertogaloppini.net/2009/11/26/apache-incubator-extraordinary-made-ordinary-the-subversion-case/comment-page-1/#comment-662061</link>
		<dc:creator>Roberto Galoppini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 09:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robertogaloppini.net/?p=1714#comment-662061</guid>
		<description>Hi Josef,

 I might agree about the general tendency towards distributed Software Configuration Systems, especially among open source communities.

So said, today ASF and many other organizations are happy with Subversion, and they might join the development team.

Time will tell, one year from now I'll check it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Josef,</p>
<p> I might agree about the general tendency towards distributed Software Configuration Systems, especially among open source communities.</p>
<p>So said, today ASF and many other organizations are happy with Subversion, and they might join the development team.</p>
<p>Time will tell, one year from now I&#8217;ll check it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Links 27/11/2009: New GNU/Linux Releases, Wikipedia Hit by FUD &#124; Boycott Novell</title>
		<link>http://robertogaloppini.net/2009/11/26/apache-incubator-extraordinary-made-ordinary-the-subversion-case/comment-page-1/#comment-662038</link>
		<dc:creator>Links 27/11/2009: New GNU/Linux Releases, Wikipedia Hit by FUD &#124; Boycott Novell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 19:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robertogaloppini.net/?p=1714#comment-662038</guid>
		<description>[...] Apache Incubator: Extraordinary Made Ordinary, the Subversion case Few days ago Subversion has been submitted to the Apache Incubator, a move praised by many as the natural fit for both projects, both for technical reasons (Apache projects use Subversion, Subversion relies on many Apache projects) and a shared vision about IP (same license) and community governance (same voting process). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Apache Incubator: Extraordinary Made Ordinary, the Subversion case Few days ago Subversion has been submitted to the Apache Incubator, a move praised by many as the natural fit for both projects, both for technical reasons (Apache projects use Subversion, Subversion relies on many Apache projects) and a shared vision about IP (same license) and community governance (same voting process). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josef Assad</title>
		<link>http://robertogaloppini.net/2009/11/26/apache-incubator-extraordinary-made-ordinary-the-subversion-case/comment-page-1/#comment-662021</link>
		<dc:creator>Josef Assad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 16:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robertogaloppini.net/?p=1714#comment-662021</guid>
		<description>I don't think svn's failure to attract developers has anything to do with what umbrella it's under, Tigris or Apache. It's more the fact that the world has moved on to distributed SCM.

Reading the answers, it seems like they expect enterprise customers to bring the innovation to the codebase. While I have trouble imagining what innovation could compete with distributed without actually BEING distributed, that - if genuine - will be more interesting to watch than any change of umbrella organisation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think svn&#8217;s failure to attract developers has anything to do with what umbrella it&#8217;s under, Tigris or Apache. It&#8217;s more the fact that the world has moved on to distributed SCM.</p>
<p>Reading the answers, it seems like they expect enterprise customers to bring the innovation to the codebase. While I have trouble imagining what innovation could compete with distributed without actually BEING distributed, that - if genuine - will be more interesting to watch than any change of umbrella organisation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

